top of page


Game company, Green Cargo, implemented a standout productivity and innovation initiative – giving their employees “‘Goldilocks tasks’. Challenges that are not too hot and not too cold, neither overly difficult nor overly simple.”


Finding that “just right” sweet spot of challenging employees, with Goldilocks management, is surprisingly uncommon, given the competitive advantage it can yield. Finding an adequate degree of challenge for individuals is one of the keys towards enabling mastery within work.


To learn more about 'Goldilocks tasks', click here.

by ARC Laureate Professor Sharon Parker


Sharon is a globally-renowned expert in the field of work psychology. As the Director of the Centre for Transformative Work Design, she leads a team concerned with improving the quality of work. She is an Australian Research Council Laureate Fellow; a Chief Investigator in the Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing, and a 2019 Highly Cited Researcher.



Some people here in Australia and around the world are heading back into the office. If this is you, today I will discuss four F’s to consider (none of which involve swearing).


I’m going to take for granted that if you are responsible for other people, you’ve taken all the steps necessary to make it safe from a physical health perspective for people to return, such as providing hand sanitiser, discussing commuting options, and setting up the space and facilities for social distancing. More details on those practical steps are below in “resources”.


My focus today is on some of the mental aspects of returning to the office.



Fear and other feelings


Returning to the office is likely to involve some fear. People will quite naturally be worried about being exposed to infection from others; after all, we’ve had months of warnings about the need to be wary of people and shared spaces! People might also be anxious about the future, and what the economic repercussions of the pandemic mean for their industry and their job prospects.


Some returning workers might even feel some anger towards their employer or manager for expecting them to come back to the office, especially if they feel this exposes them to health risks.


And it would be quite natural, too, to experience a sense of loss. When people return to the office, it means they are likely to be giving some things up that they have come to value whilst working at home. This might be more freedom during the day about their work schedule, more time with family, or, in my case, listening to the native birds from my garden office.


A finally, some people might be dreading a huge backlog of tasks that it hasn’t been possible to do from home.

Whatever your feelings, it is important to recognise what is going on for you. Warding off your feelings, or ignoring them, tends to be an unhelpful coping strategy [1]. It is usually much better to share your feelings with others, and, if it helps, re-appraise them or take active steps to address the issue.

For example, if you are worried about social distancing measures during commuting, you could investigate other possible ways you might get to work, or negotiate with your boss to be able to travel in during quieter times, and/or make sure you’re fully up-to-date on the appropriate precautionary measures.


Whenever change occurs, we experience emotional reactions to that change, and this is entirely normal.


If you are a boss, avoid the temptation to simply label people’s emotional reactions as “resistance” and to assume the reactions are “irrational” [2]. Instead, approach the change from the perspective of your employee – talk to them and understand their viewpoint. You will usually find what initially appeared irrational to you makes sense when you take the time to see the world from another person’s perspective. Focus your efforts on supporting people back into the workplace, and this includes acknowledging and accepting as legitimate their emotional responses, and being empathic.



Fantasies and reverse culture shock


In contrast to the above, you might be feeling excited about returning to the office because of the chance to connect with people ‘properly’ or because you are looking forward to getting back into some of the work it’s not been possible to do at home. If this is you, I hope these expectations are met!


But be warned….

Returning to the office or “getting back to normal” might have some parallels with an ex-pat returning to their country of origin. Research shows that repatriation, or coming back into your own country, can be very difficult.

Indeed, strangely, returning home can be a more difficult adjustment than settling into a new country [3]. For people who go back to their home countries, nearly 40% leave again within three years, very often because of difficulties in repatriation [4, 5].


What is going on with this reverse culture shock? Sometimes it is because, since you’ve been overseas, you’ve changed, yet your friends and family have not [6]. Sometimes it’s because when you’ve been away you idealize your home country and glamorize what you left behind, which means your expectations about home are unrealistic [3]. Sometimes adjustment is difficult because you assume it will be easy because you its ‘your culture’ - what is there to adjust to, after all you are returning ‘home,’ are you not? And sometimes your home place has changed whilst you’ve been away, in unexpected ways. All this means that people’s feelings on return can take them by surprise[7].


I predict that some of us might experience similar “reverse culture shock” issues when we return to the work office. We expect that we’re returning ‘back to the normal’ situation, but, in fact, we are different, and the ‘normal’ is not quite how we remembered it. I believe we’re going to need to invest just about as much time adjusting to the office as we did when setting up to work from home.


If you’re a boss, this means - just as it has been necessary for companies to learn that repatriated employees need supporting when we return home - as your staff return back to the office, you will need to support your staff, and help them adjust back to the new situation.



Flexibility and preserving what we’ve learnt

Most of us have learned a lot about being flexible these past months, and it makes sense to preserve some of this flexibility in the months ahead.

First, things could change. There might be new waves of COVID cases, and hence a need for another lock down. In the end, we simply don’t know what is going to happen, so we need to be ready to return home if needed.


Second, and just as important, being flexible has benefits. It would be a shame to revert totally back to usual and throw out the valuable learnings we have had as remote workers. In fact, research shows that telecommuting has some small but overall beneficial effects on outcomes like job satisfaction, role stress, and job performance (especially if the worker has had autonomy and positive relationships with one’s boss) [8]. Other research shows that –for people who spend some time in the office and some time at home – that people’s ability to concentrate is higher, and their need for recovery is lower, on home days than on office day [9].


Yet other studies show that collaboration is easier at work, and that people who spend 100% of their time working remotely are lonelier [10]. So, to the extent its feasible given the type of work people do, having some in-office days, and some out-of-office days, might be a great way to get the best of both worlds.



Fun


Given the feelings of trepidation that some people might have about returning to the office, and the likely need for more readjustment than expected, I recommend arranging some enjoyable activities to bring people together when they return.


Maybe sharing favourite working from home tik-toks, or bringing in cakes? Even just sitting around and casually chatting without being in front of screen might be rather wonderful…

If you’re heading back to the office soon, best wishes for your re-entry.


Resources


About logistics of setting up the office:




References

1. Roth, S. and L.J. Cohen, Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. American Psychologist, 1986. 41(7): p. 813-819.


2. Emotions in organizational behavior. Emotions in organizational behavior. 2005, Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. xxv, 425-xxv, 425.


3. Adler, N.J., Re-Entry: Managing Cross-Cultural Transitions. Group & Organization Studies, 1981. 6(3): p. 341-356.


4. Grant, L., That overseas job could derail your career, in Fortune. 1997: New York.


5. O’Boyle, T., Grappling with the expatriate issue. The Wall Street Journal, 1989. 11: p. B1.


6. Black, J.S., Coming home: The relationship of expatriate expectations with repatriation adjustment and job performance. Human relations, 1992. 45(2): p. 177-192.


7. Andreason, A.W. and K.D. Kinneer, Repatriation adjustment problems and the successful reintegration of expatriates and their families. .Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 2005. 6(2): p. 109-126.


8. Gajendran, R.S. and D.A. Harrison, The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta‐analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007. 92(6): p. 1524-1541.


9. Biron, M. and M. van Veldhoven, When control becomes a liability rather than an asset: Comparing home and office days among part-time teleworkers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2016. 37(8): p. 1317-1337.


10. Brodt, T.L. and R.M. Verburg, Managing mobile work—insights from European practice. New Technology, Work and Employment, 2007. 22(1): p. 52-65.

by ARC Laureate Professor Sharon Parker


Sharon is a globally-renowned expert in the field of work psychology. As the Director of the Centre for Transformative Work Design, she leads a team concerned with improving the quality of work. She is an Australian Research Council Laureate Fellow; a Chief Investigator in the Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing, and a 2019 Highly Cited Researcher.



Here in Perth, we’re having that gorgeous weather that is perfect for gardening in or cups of tea in the sun. We’ve also had quite a few breaks of late. Several people have said to me they’ve “gotten used to doing nothing”. One of my (quite young) colleagues indicated that retirement was seeming attractive. It seems some of us have lost our work mojo…


So, how do we maintain concentration and focus to stay productive?



1. Plan your day.


The days that I lose my focus usually correspond to the days in which I start the morning checking my email – and inevitably, I fall down the email rabbit hole. Before I know it, my precious 90-minute non-meeting time that I keep aside for writing in the morning has gone… And after that, I never quite seem to recover, and I flounder my way through the day.


On the other hand, I usually have a good day - a focused day- when the first thing I do is plan what I’m going to do. I look at my Trello board, which has all the things I need to do that day and that week, and I look at my calendar for my meetings. Then I merge the information from these and write down on a piece of paper what I am going to do every hour of the day.


Research supports me here. There’s a huge amount of evidence showing that setting goals improves productivity [1], and having concrete and specific goals focused on ‘means’ rather than ‘ends’ also helps [2]. For example, rather than having a goal like “learn a new skill” (which is both vague and ends-oriented) your goal might be “identify and enrol in an EdX course for project management”.


Now… your particular rabbit hole might not be email… It might be Whatsapp, or reading the news, or deciding to quickly clean the house. I’m not saying you shouldn’t do these things, but they need to be structured into your daily plan….


2. Schedule important but non urgent tasks


On a good and focused day, the first thing I try to do is some academic writing. This is mentally demanding work, so I do it in the morning when my brain is fresh. Most importantly, this is an important but not urgent task that will not get done unless I schedule it. I’ve put this in bold because it’s so important. Let me explain some more.


Many of you will be familiar with the basic time management tool in which you consider your tasks in terms of their urgency and their importance (see below). This tool identifies four quadrants:



For more detail, see our website here: https://www.womeninresearch.org.au/time-management

Fairly obviously, you will need to focus on the important and urgent tasks, managing carefully your time in order to them them done.

Also fairly obviously, you should limit the low importance/ low urgency tasks (e.g., online shopping) as these hold little value and mostly are distracting. Try using these activities as a “micro break” and as a reward for your concentration.


You will also need to avoid or minimise engaging in tasks that are not important but urgent. These are the hardest tasks sometimes to deal with. For me, emails fit into this category, and its why I refer to the email “rabbit hole” because sometimes when I start doing emails, I can get hooked into wasting a lot of time, preventing me from more important tasks.


The biggest mistake many of us make is that – because we get sucked into the urgent tasks, including the unimportant ones, we then fail to focus on the important yet non-urgent tasks.


A crucial lesson I have learnt throughout my career with regard to time management, is that I must schedule these important yet non-urgent tasks if I want to get some focus on them. My assistant, Sana, always tries to keep the first 90 minutes of my day free for this purpose, and I use those 90 minutes to do those academic writing tasks I mentioned earlier (writing in our profession is crucial for success, and yet it usually doesn’t have deadlines). In non-pandemic times, I spend this block of time in a coffee shop where there is no internet connection or colleagues to distract me so that I retain focus.


If you don’t schedule your important yet not urgent tasks, one of two things will happen. First, you never do the important task, meaning you neglect critical aspects of your job. You never ever put in that funding application, for example, which hurts your finances and career.

Second, you only do the important task when it becomes urgent. This second option can mean that you then put yourself under unnecessary pressure and stress, and create a vicious circle of never getting on top of things. If every day, you lurch from one urgent and important task to the next, this can be stressful over the longer term.


Now that I am working from home I find it harder to focus on those important not urgent writing tasks. As I’ve already confessed, I sometimes fail and fall into the email vortex. Hence the importance of writing my daily plan, before anything else. This keeps me honest, and makes me consciously schedule those tasks into the day.


3. Engage in short bursts of concentrated activity


When we concentrate, we use our frontal cortex in our brains. Neurological studies show that its harder to keep this part of our brain functioning than other parts of our brain. It takes effort.

Studies vary a bit – some suggest we lose focus after 90 minutes, some after 45 minutes, some after 10 minutes – in fact, our concentration spans depends a bit on what we’re doing (and how engaging the task is) and who we are [3]. For me, I think I focus well for about 50 minutes.

Because our capacity to concentrate deeply is finite, one strategy can be to work in chunks. For example, work for 50 minutes, have a 5-10 minute break, then get back to work.

The Pomodoro technique is based on this reasoning. Developed by Francesco Cirillo, and now embedded into hundreds of time management apps, this approach uses a timer to break down work into 25 minute intervals, each separated by short breaks. Because Cirillo used a tomato-shaped kitchen timer to time his breaks, he used the Italian word for tomato (pomodoro) to name the technique. You don’t have to be as rigid as this technique (although some might find the rigidity helpful), but when you are writing your daily plan, plan for discrete chunks of activity with breaks in between.


4. Reward your success with micro breaks

After your period of concentration, evidence shows the importance of having a break [4]. It can be what is referred to as a micro break – a short activity that is not related to work that boosts your energy [5, 6]; see Box 1 below). Having micro breaks or short rests:

  • Increases productivity [7]

  • Reduces the risk of on-the-job mistakes and accidents [8]

  • Reduces boredom and fatigue [9]

Your micro break might be a coffee, a stretch, a quick nag of the teenagers who are meant to home schooling, and hanging up the washing. It might even be a five-minute day dream – research shows that a little bit of “deliberate mind wandering” (in which you allow your mind to meander freely) – is good for you and doesn’t impair your productivity [10, 11].

Or, your break might be a dip into nature. Attention restoration theory [12] argues that nature captures your attention involuntarily, in an automatic manner, which is restorative because there is no need to consciously direct your attention. One study showed that a 40 second micro-break spent viewing a city scene with a flowering meadow green roof boosted attention more than looking at a bare concrete roof[13].

You will know a break is needed when you are not making progress on the task, when you’re slowing down or making errors, when non-task related thoughts keep coming into your mind, when you feel cross or some other sort of negative affect, you keep yawning, and when your gaze keeps shifting. These and other indicators of cognitive depletion mean that it is time to rest your brain [14].


5. Avoid distractions


Last but not least, avoid distractions. Although it’s not always the case, some evidence shows distractions can require around 23 minutes to get back to your original task, and they can mean you then have to put yourself under greater pressure to get the work done [15].

Some of the worst distractions in contemporary times come from our mobile phones and automated apps on the computer. Professor Gillian Yeo, myself, and Nicole Gillespie are working on a paper [16] in which we talk about “attention hijackers”, or those things that sabotage your attention, and stop you from either concentration or just letting your mind wander freely. An example of an attention hijacker is an email notification (or the notifications from a Teams online discussion channel or Whatsapp or Facebook or a million other apps!).

We recommend you turn off your email, Teams, Whatsapp, or any other notifications during your focused chunks of activity, so you can control when you respond. It is more productive to do your emails as a chunk of concentrated activity at a time chosen by you rather than by notifications [17].

Box 1: Micro-breaks [5, 18]
1. Drink water
2. Have a snack
3. Go to the bathroom
4. Drink a caffeinated beverage
5. Do some form of physical activity, including walks or stretching
6. Talk to someone about common interests (like sports or hobbies)
7. Check in with a friend or family member
8. Listen to music
9. Surf the web
10. Go outside for some fresh air
11. Check and send personal e-mails and text messages
12. Make plans for the evening or weekend
13. Look out the window
14. Do an errand
15. Read something for fun
16. Daydream
17. Shop
18. Meditate
19. Nap
20. Write in a journal

Resources




References

1. Locke, E.A., et al., Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. Psychological Bulletin, 1981. 90(1): p. 125-152.


2. Kaftan, O.J. and A.M. Freund, The Way is the Goal: The Role of Goal Focus for Successful Goal Pursuit and Subjective Well-Being, in Handbook of wellbeing, E. Diener, S. Oishi, and L. Tay, Editors. 2018, DEF Publishers: Salt Lake City, UT.


3. Bradbury, N.A., Attention span during lectures: 8 seconds, 10 minutes, or more? Advances in Physiology Education, 2016. 40(4): p. 509-513.


4. Ariga, A. and A. Lleras, Brief and rare mental “breaks” keep you focused: Deactivation and reactivation of task goals preempt vigilance decrements. Cognition, 2011. 118(3): p. 439-443.


5. Fritz, C., C.F. Lam, and G.M. Spreitzer, It's the Little Things That Matter: An Examination of Knowledge Workers' Energy Management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2011. 25(3): p. 28-39.


6. Trougakos John, P. and I. Hideg, Momentary work recovery: The role of within-day work breaks, in Current Perspectives on Job-Stress Recovery, S. Sabine, L.P. Pamela, and C.G. Daniel, Editors. 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited. p. 37-84.


7. Dababneh, A.J., N. Swanson, and R.L. Shell, Impact of added rest breaks on the productivity and well being of workers. Ergonomics, 2001. 44(2): p. 164-174.


8. Tucker, P., S. Folkard, and I. Macdonald, Rest breaks and accident risk. The Lancet, 2003. 361(9358): p. 680.


9. Tucker, P., The impact of rest breaks upon accident risk, fatigue and performance: A review. Work & Stress, 2003. 17(2): p. 123-137.


10. Seli, P., et al., Mind-Wandering With and Without Intention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2016. 20(8): p. 605-617.


11. Mason, M.F., et al., Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought. Science, 2007. 315(5810): p. 393.


12. Kaplan, S., The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1995. 15(3): p. 169-182.


13. Lee, K.E., et al., 40-second green roof views sustain attention: The role of micro-breaks in attention restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2015. 42: p. 182-189.


14. Franklin, L., K. Lerman, and N. Hodas, Will break for productivity: generalized symptoms of cognitive depletion. arXiv, 2017. 1706.01521


15. Mark, G., D. Gudith, and U. Klocke, The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2008, Association for Computing Machinery: Florence, Italy. p. 107–110.


16. Yeo, G., S.K. Parker, and N. Celestine, “Slack time” at work, in 79th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. 2019: Boston.


17. Mark, G., et al., Email Duration, Batching and Self-interruption: Patterns of Email Use on Productivity and Stress, in Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2016, Association for Computing Machinery: San Jose, California, USA. p. 1717–1728.


18. Zacher, H., H.A. Brailsford, and S.L. Parker, Micro-breaks matter: A diary study on the effects of energy management strategies on occupational well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2014. 85(3): p. 287-297.


Follow us

  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube
  • X
CTWD Horizontal_White.png
3459BAL_Future of Work Institute logo_Ke

The Centre for Transformative Work Design

is part of the Future of Work Institute at Curtin University.

© 2026 Centre for Transformative Work Design​​

The Centre acknowledges Whadjuk Nyungar people who remain Custodians of the lands on which we research, learn and collaborate.

bottom of page